Click here to CONTACT CONGRESS through our Legislative Action Center
The CPSC legislative agenda for 2010 reflects our membership's professional priorities as we adapt to an increasingly complex, labor-intensive health care sector driven by a higher demand for specialized care from a rapidly aging U.S. population. The U.S. Department of Labor estimates the U.S. will need between 5.7 million to 6.5 million nurses, nurse aides, and home health and personal care workers by 2050 to care for the 27 million Americans who will require long term care - up more than 100 percent from the 13 million requiring long term care in 2000. With demand for care rising and our nation's supply of caregivers shrinking, it is incumbent upon federal and state lawmakers to ensure the nation's long term care workforce remains a vital, respected, growing segment of our nation's workforce commensurate with the monumental and historic health care challenges ahead.
With the passage of health care reform legislation and $14.6 billion in Medicare cuts included for skilled nursing care, we urge policymakers to avoid any additional cuts to Medicare payments in long term care as budget deliberations continue for Fiscal Year 2011. One of the valuable lessons we have learned over the years is that given the shortfalls in Medicaid spending, Medicare needs to be adequately be funded. Medicaid cuts in cash strapped states are already making an impact on long term care workforce, the indispensible component to quality care for our seniors.CPSC's key issues agenda for 2010 are:
Strengthening the U.S. Long Term Care Workforce
The provision of high quality nursing home care and services is contingent upon a stable, well-trained workforce. America's long term care system, however, is currently suffering from a chronic supply and demand problem when it comes to our specific sector's labor force. Addressing this staffing challenge is the only real means by which to sustain the provision of high quality long term care for seniors today and in the decades ahead.
Protecting Medicare Funding for Eldercare
On May 12, 2009, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) to update Medicare payments for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in FY 2010 and to modify the SNF prospective payment system (PPS) in FY 2011. The CMS proposed rule once again seeks to accommodate for its FY 2006 projection error related to the adoption of new patient classification categories, which would slash $1.05 billion in Medicare funding for crucial skilled nursing care in FY 2010 - estimated to be $18 billion over a ten year period. The cut became effective October 2009 is already having a far reaching impact in the long term care community, compounded by our nation's hard hit economy. In FY 2010 alone, CMS' Medicare cut will result in job losses of more than 30,000, the elimination of $2.54 billion in business activity and an additional $1.1 billion in lost wages and income.
Medicaid Funding That Meets the Cost of Care
While 65 percent of nursing home residents rely on Medicaid to cover the care they need, Medicaid continues to be funded far below the actual cost of caring for the frail elderly in our country. An independent national study conducted by ElJay, LLP estimated the 2008 Medicaid shortfall to be $12.48 per patient per day less than the actual cost of care - a $4.2 billion national shortfall. Chronic Medicaid underfunding and billions of dollars in proposed Medicare cuts threatens to compromise the quality of care a dedicated long term "care force" can deliver due to existing staffing shortages and a potential loss of thousands of caregiver jobs. True healthcare reform will include sustained and adequate funding for our most vulnerable Medicaid beneficiaries in nursing homes.
Making the appropriate investment in Medicaid can help reduce the number and frequency of hospital admissions by improving resident health, and increasing the capability of skilled nursing facilities themselves to successfully treat more complex medical conditions. It is essential to ensure seniors are protected, care quality improvements are sustained, key staff jobs preserved and operating and staffing needs are met through adequate funding of Medicaid coupled with no reductions in Medicare reimbursement. In the absence of a federal statute requiring state Medicaid programs to reimburse the cost of providing care, long term care providers and the frontline long term care workforce will continue to struggle to care for some of our most vulnerable citizens.
Long Term Care Reform
Real healthcare reform recognizes the changing nature and needs of America's elderly patient population, and improving caregivers' ability to do their jobs in the most effective manner possible. Increasing numbers of post-hospital patients, coupled with the continued presence of high acuity chronic care patients, creates both growing challenges and unique opportunities in the context of reform. In addition to achieving quantifiable, long term quality improvements, the ultimate policy goal for long term care reform must be to achieve the most efficient use of health care resources by ensuring patients receive care in the lowest cost setting that best meets their needs.
Improving the CMS Five-Star Nursing Home Ratings System
CPSC believes that reliably and accurately measuring quality -- and publicly disclosing the results -- will help consumers identify the facility that best meets their needs and specific condition. Timely public disclosure helps improve facility performance, increases accountability, and ultimately benefits patient and caregiver alike. Unfortunately, however, in the rush to announce the Five-Star ratings system before the last days of the outgoing Bush Administration, a system that has not been reliably validated -- and risks providing consumers with inaccurate and incomplete information regarding facility quality -- is now operational. We look forward to working closely with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Congress to make rapid and dramatic improvements in the accuracy and ultimate value of the ratings system.
